Please click here to view the Final Program!!
Exhibition: Installation
April 26, 3:00 pm ~ April 27


Meeting Information
Faculty
• Course Directors
• Course Co-Directors
• Scientific Committee
• International Faculty
• Korean Faculty
• Associations and Affiliations
Scientific Program
• Meeting at a Glance
• Program Highlights
Program
  - Main Arena
  - Coronary Arena
  - Endovascular Arena
  - Tutorial Arena
  - Breakfast Meetings
  - Satellite Symposia
  - Oral Abstract Presentation
  - Case Presentation
  - Live Case Operators
  - Conference for
    Cardiovascular Nurse
    & Technologist

  - Cardiopulmonary
    Rehabilitation Workshop

  - Clinical Exercise Specialist
    (CES) Workshop

Live Case Sites
Live Case Demonstration
TCTAP Live Interview
TCTAP Gallery
View E-poster Abstracts
Accepted Abstracts
Accepted Cases
Daily Newspaper
Advance Registration
Factoid
Syllabus
Visa Requirements
Housing
Exhibition
    & Promotion Activities
• General Information
• Exhibitor's List & Floor Plan
ACT Tour
Tour Information
• Korea, Sparkling
• About Seoul
  - Shopping in Korea
  - Food & Restaurant in Korea
• Tour Program
Contact Us
About CVRF
Floor Map Download
2010 Brochure Download
AS-275
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Stenting versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Results from the MAINCOMPARE Registry
1Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (Republic of)
S.J. Park1
Background:
Although numerous studies have compared the treatment effects of stenting and coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), the long-term (5-year) outcomes among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease who underwent coronary stents or CABG have not been evaluated.
Methods:
We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n=1,102; bare-metal stents [BMS] 318 and drug-eluting stents [DES] 784) or underwent CABG (n=1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for 3 to 9 years (mean, 5.0 years). We compared adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target-vessel revascularization [TVR]) with the use of propensity-score matching.
Results:
In the overall-matched cohort (542 pairs), the overall risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.41, P=0.94) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.40, P=0.86) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The rates of TVR were significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR, 4.29; 95% CI, 2.73 to 6.74, P<0.001). In comparison of BMS with concurrent CABG (207 pairs), the risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.61, P=0.98) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.48, P=0.81) were not significantly different, whereas the risk of TVR was significantly higher in the BMS group (HR, 6.98; 95% CI, 3.10 to 15.70, P<0.001). In comparison of DES with concurrent CABG (396 pairs), the risks of death (HR, HR 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.91, P=0.25) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.89, P=0.16) did not statistically differ, but the rate of TVR was also significantly higher in the DES group (HR, 6.79; 95% CI, 3.49 to 13.20, P<0.001).
Conclusion:
During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed equivalent long-term (5-year) mortality and the rate of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke as compared with CABG for unprotected LMCA disease. However, stenting, even with DES, was associated with higher rates of TVR than was CABG.