E-Abstract

Lots of interesting abstracts and cases were submitted for TCTAP 2026. Below are the accepted ones after a thorough review by our official reviewers. Don¡¯t miss the opportunity to expand your knowledge!

ABS20251115_0003

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Independently Predicts High Coronary Lesion Complexity in Asian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comprehensive Registry Analysis

By Melly Susanti, Seung-Woon Rha

Presenter

Melly Susanti

Authors

Melly Susanti1, Seung-Woon Rha2

Affiliation

Ministry of Health Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia1, Korea University Guro Hospital, Indonesia2
View Study Report
ABS20251115_0003
Clinical Trials & Science

Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Independently Predicts High Coronary Lesion Complexity in Asian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Comprehensive Registry Analysis

Melly Susanti1, Seung-Woon Rha2

Ministry of Health Hospital Surabaya, Indonesia1, Korea University Guro Hospital, Indonesia2

Background

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent cardiovascular risk factor, yet its association with coronary lesion complexity in Asian populations undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains inadequately characterized.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,829 consecutive Asian patients who underwent PCI with measured Lp(a) levels. Given ethnic variations in Lp(a) distribution, we used an Asian population-appropriate threshold of ¡Ã30 mg/dL as the primary cutoff, with 50 mg/dL analyzed as secondary comparison. Lesion complexity was assessed using a 6-component score (range 0-6) including chronic total occlusion, ¡Ã2 stents, total stent length ¡Ã60mm, bifurcation lesions, multivessel disease, and severe calcification. We applied 1:1 propensity-score matching and multivariable linear regression to adjust for confounding.

Results

Of 1,829 patients (mean age 63.3 ¡¾ 10.9 years; 67% male), 639 (35%) had Lp(a) ¡Ã30 mg/dL. Before matching, mean complexity scores were 2.34 ¡¾ 2.01 vs 1.35 ¡¾ 1.46 (Lp(a) ¡Ã30 vs <30; P < 0.001). After matching (n = 498 vs 498), elevated Lp(a) remained associated with higher complexity (2.28 ¡¾ 1.98 vs 1.45 ¡¾ 1.54; P < 0.001). In adjusted models, Lp(a) ¡Ã30 mg/dL independently predicted higher complexity (¥â = 0.834; 95% CI, 0.656–1.012; P < 0.001), along with diabetes (P < 0.001), LDL-C (per 10 mg/dL ¥â = 0.03; P < 0.01), age (per year ¥â = 0.011; P < 0.01), and lower LVEF (per 10% ¥â = −0.17; P < 0.001). A dose-response was evident across Lp(a) categories—<30, 30–49, and ¡Ã50 mg/dL—with ascending scores (1.35 ¡¾ 1.46, 2.31 ¡¾ 1.96, 2.37 ¡¾ 2.07; P trend < 0.001). Findings were similar using the ¡Ã50 mg/dL cutoff (P < 0.001)

Conclusion

Elevated Lp(a) ¡Ã30 mg/dL independently predicts significantly higher coronary lesion complexity in Asian patients undergoing PCI, with associations persisting after rigorous adjustment for confounders through both propensity matching and multivariable regression. These findings demonstrate that Lp(a) serves not only as a cardiovascular risk biomarker but also as a predictor of procedural complexity, supporting routine Lp(a) screening to enhance pre-procedural risk stratification and guide lesion preparation strategies in Asian populations.