E-Abstract

Lots of interesting abstracts and cases were submitted for TCTAP 2026. Below are the accepted ones after a thorough review by our official reviewers. Don¡¯t miss the opportunity to expand your knowledge!

ABS20251107_0006

Stratifying Death Risk After Rotational Atherectomy Using the BCIS-CHIP Score

By Chin-Chin Chang, Yi-Lin Tsai, Wei-Ting Sung, Yu-Yu Lu, Shao-Sung Huang, Cheng-Hsueh Wu, Po-Hsun Huang, Tse-Ming Lu

Presenter

Chin-Chin Chang

Authors

Chin-Chin Chang1, Yi-Lin Tsai1, Wei-Ting Sung1, Yu-Yu Lu1, Shao-Sung Huang1, Cheng-Hsueh Wu1, Po-Hsun Huang1, Tse-Ming Lu1

Affiliation

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan1
View Study Report
ABS20251107_0006
Calcified Lesion

Stratifying Death Risk After Rotational Atherectomy Using the BCIS-CHIP Score

Chin-Chin Chang1, Yi-Lin Tsai1, Wei-Ting Sung1, Yu-Yu Lu1, Shao-Sung Huang1, Cheng-Hsueh Wu1, Po-Hsun Huang1, Tse-Ming Lu1

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan1

Background

Patients undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) for heavily calcified coronary artery disease (CAD) represent a complex and high-risk population. The British Cardiovascular Intervention Society–Complex High-Risk and Indicated Patients (BCIS-CHIP) score was developed to quantify procedural and clinical complexity, but its prognostic utility in RA-treated patients remains unclear.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included consecutive patients with severe calcified CAD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RA between January 2017 and September 2024. The BCIS-CHIP score was calculated for each patient and used to stratify the cohort into a high-risk group (score ¡Ã 5) and a low-risk group (score < 5). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, and long-term mortality were compared between groups. The association between the BCIS-CHIP score and all-cause mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

A total of 423 patients (mean age 70.8 ¡¾ 11.0 years70.8% men) were included. Patients with high BCIS-CHIP scores had significantly more comorbidities and procedural complexity compared with those with low scores. The in-hospital mortality rate was markedly higher in the high-risk group (16.7% vs. 1.7%; P < 0.001), as was 1-year mortality(26.3% vs. 4.6%; P < 0.001). Over a mean follow-up of 993 ¡¾ 762 days, a high BCIS-CHIP score was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 3.16; 95% CI 2.26–4.41; P < 0.001).


Conclusion

The BCIS-CHIP score effectively predicts all-cause mortality among patients with severe calcified CAD undergoing RA. This simple, validated risk tool may help clinicians identify high-risk patients who could benefit from intensified peri-procedural management and closer follow-up.