Lots of interesting abstracts and cases were submitted for TCTAP 2026. Below are the accepted ones after a thorough review by our official reviewers. Don¡¯t miss the opportunity to expand your knowledge!
ABS20250918_0002
Heart Failure Management With Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (Bisoprolol vs. Carvedilol) in Indian Population: A Prospective Study
By Hakim Irfan Showkat, Sadaf Anwar
Presenter
Hakim Irfan Showkat
Authors
Hakim Irfan Showkat1, Sadaf Anwar1
Affiliation
Srinagar MedCity Heart Institute, India1
View Study Report
ABS20250918_0002
Pharmacotherapy (Heart Failure)
Heart Failure Management With Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (Bisoprolol vs. Carvedilol) in Indian Population: A Prospective Study
Hakim Irfan Showkat1, Sadaf Anwar1
Srinagar MedCity Heart Institute, India1
Background
Beta-blockers, including carvediloland bisoprolol, are commonly recommended for the management of heart failurewith reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Variations in dosing regimens and theircomparative efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality remain a subject ofdebate. Howeverdifferent doses and their relative efficacy in reducing morbidity &mortality cause are contradictory. The present study evaluated the effects ofCarvedilol and Bisoprolol in different doses on Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction(LVEF), Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, Arrhyhthmias, Inflammatory markers, MACE,Hospital Admission & Mortality in patients with HFrEF along with guidelinedirected medical or device therapy (GDMT).
Methods
Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted involving 138 individuals presentingwith symptomatic HFrEF classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) classIII-IV. Participants were randomized into two treatment groups, receivingeither carvedilol or bisoprolol at dosages determined by physician discretion,in conjunction with guideline-directed medical or device therapy (GDMT).Clinical parameters and objective evidence were assessed at baseline and after6 to 12 months of follow-up.
Results
Result: Baseline male predominance was observed in both groups (63.33% forcarvedilol, 56.67% for bisoprolol). The majority of patients were NYHA classIII. Both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements followingthree months of therapy (p ¡Â 0.05). In the carvedilol cohort, mean LVEFincreased from 32.26% to 46.4%, heart rate and blood pressure decreased from104.23 to 85.13 bpm and from 125.6/83.3 to 91.3/62.5 mmHg, respectively. Thebisoprolol group showed improvements from 31.5% to 45.3% LVEF, 102.8 to 72.4bpm, and 127.4/82.2 to 102.2/74.2 mmHg, respectively. No statisticallysignificant differences were evident between the cohorts (p > 0.05).Hospitalization due to hypotension occurred more frequently in the carvedilolgroup (22.2% vs. 5.4% for bisoprolol). Adequate rate control was observed in54% of carvedilol and 72% of high-dose bisoprolol-treated patients. Mortalityrates were higher in the carvedilol cohort, which reached statisticalsignificance
Conclusion
Conclusion: Bisoprolol, administered twice daily at either low or high dose,demonstrated superiority in reducing rates of hospitalization, hypotension, andmortality compared to carvedilol in patients with HFrEF.
