summitMD.com    Angioplasty Summit-TCT Asia Pacific
Welcome
Meeting Information
Course Directors
Faculty
• International Faculty
• Korean Faculty
Summit Live
     Interview
Scientific Program
• Meeting at a Glance
Program
     Slide Presentation

- Main Arena
- Coronary Arena
- Syposium Arena
- Satellite Symposia
- Breakfast Meetings
- Live Case Operators
- Conference for
       Cardiovascular Nurse
       & Technologist

Live Case
    Transmission Sites
Live Case
    Demonstration
Best & Accepted
    Challenging Case
Abstracts
• Accepted Abstracts
• E-poster Abstracts
• E-poster Abstract
       Guideline

• Oral & Best Abstract
Pre-Registration
Syllabus
Factoid
Gallery 2007
Learning Center
Housing
Exhibition
• Exhibit Information
• Exhibitor List & Floor
       Plan

Seoul Information
• Seoul Information
• Embassies in Korea
Tours

AS-001
Triple Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy In Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
1Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea (Republic of); 2Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea (Republic of)
K.Y. Chen1, S.W. Rha1, Z. Jin1, Y. Minami1, J.O. Na1, C.U. Choi1, S.Y. Suh1, J.W. Kim1, E.J. Kim1, C.G. Park1, H.S. Seo1, D.J. Oh1, M.H. Jeong2
Background:
Whether the safety and efficacy of triple antiplatelet strategy is superior or similar to the dual antiplatelet strategy in patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear.
Methods:
A total of 4,892 AMI pts undergoing PCI were randomly assigned to receive either dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel, Dual group, n=2,974) or triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus cilostazol, Triple group, n=1,918). All major adverse cardiac events (All MACE) included total death, revascularization, and myocardial re-infarction. The bleeding complications and clinical outcomes of in-hospital, 1 and 6 months were compared between the two groups.
Results:
The baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The early mortality and revascularization rate were lower in Triple group up to one month and all MACE was significantly lower up to 6 months. Interestingly, Triple group also had a significantly lower in-hospital major bleeding (Table). This result might be due to the Triple group had less history of peptic ulcer disease (0.4% vs. 0.9%, P=0.034).Table: Clinical outcomes of study population
Variable, n (%)Dual group(n=2,974 pts)Triple group(n= 1,918 pts)P value
In-hospital   
Total death89 (3.0)34 (1.8)0.008
Reinfarction 12 (0.4)9 (0.5)0.730
Revascularization 41 (1.4)12 (0.6)0.013
All MACE142 (4.8)55 (2.9)0.001
TIMI-major bleeding12 (0.6)3 (0.2)0.023
At 1 month   
Total death106 (3.7)50 (2.7)0.046
Reinfarction 25 (0.9)10 (0.5)0.175
Revascularization71 (2.5)26 (1.4)0.008
  All MACE202 (7.1)86 (4.6)0.001
At 6 months   
Total death124 (4.3)65 (3.5)0.147
Reinfarction 34 (1.2)13 (0.7)0.097
Revascularization150 (5.2)75 (4.0)0.055
All MACE308 (10.7)153 (8.2)0.004
 
Conclusion:
Triple antiplatelet therapy appears to be superior in preventing the MACE without increasing the major bleeding events in pts with AMI undergoing PCI compared with the conventional dual antiplatelet therapy.
Copyright © 2002 CVRF, Seoul, Korea. All rights reserved.